Educational example only - This is a fictitious report created to help you understand how I read and interpret a Penile Doppler. No real patient data is shown.

GGO Med logo

Penile Colour Doppler Ultrasound

Mr Giangiacomo Ollandini · Consultant Urological Surgeon

Patient Ref: EXAMPLE-001 · Date: [Fictitious]

Chelsea & Westminster Hospital

False venous leak resolved with adrenergic blockade

Clinical background

32-year-old man referred with 18-month history of erectile difficulty. Reports erections adequate during masturbation but inconsistent with partner. Morning erections present but perceived as reduced. No significant cardiovascular risk factors. BMI 24. Non-smoker. No regular medications. Referred by GP after trial of sildenafil 50mg with partial response.

Technique

Pharmacostimulation: Alprostadil 10 mcg intracavernosal injection (T=0). B-mode and colour Doppler assessment of both cavernosal arteries at serial intervals. Patient counselled throughout. Privacy maintained.

B-mode findings

Corpora cavernosa symmetrical with homogeneous echotexture bilaterally. No plaque, fibrosis, or calcification identified. Tunica albuginea intact. Both cavernosal arteries visualised - right 0.8 mm, left 0.7 mm at baseline. Regular walls, no stenosis.

Haemodynamic findings - Test 1 (Alprostadil only)

TimeSidePSV (cm/s)EDV (cm/s)RITumescenceHR
T+5 minR
48
14
0.71
Partial
106
T+5 minL
45
13
0.71
Partial
106
T+10 minR
59
12
0.80
Partial
102
T+10 minL
55
12
0.78
Partial
102
T+15 minR
56
11
0.80
Partial+
100
T+15 minL
52
11
0.79
Partial+
100
T+20 minR
52
11
0.79
Partial+
98
T+20 minL
50
10
0.80
Partial+
98
Penile Doppler waveform - elevated EDV with high heart rate (false venous leak pattern)
Representative waveform - Test 1: PSV 59.6 cm/s, EDV 12.2 cm/s, HR 102 bpm. Note persistent diastolic flow above baseline despite good arterial inflow.
Representative waveform

Haemodynamic observations - Test 1: Bilateral PSV consistently above 45 cm/s, peaking at 59 cm/s - arterial inflow is adequate. However, end-diastolic velocity remains elevated throughout (10-14 cm/s), and the patient did not achieve full rigidity. RI remains below 0.90 at all time points.

Heart rate remained between 98-106 bpm throughout the study. Patient appeared tense despite verbal reassurance.

Pattern: This haemodynamic profile is consistent with either corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction or sympathetic override in an anxious patient. A repeat study with phentolamine was offered to differentiate.

Haemodynamic findings - Test 2 (Alprostadil + Phentolamine)

Repeat study performed on a separate date. Same protocol with addition of phentolamine 1 mg to the injection mix.

TimeSidePSV (cm/s)EDV (cm/s)RITumescenceHR
T+5 minR
56
3
0.95
Full
78
T+5 minL
52
2
0.96
Full
78
T+10 minR
55
-5
1.09
Full rigid
76
T+10 minL
52
-6
1.12
Full rigid
76
T+15 minR
53
-9
1.20
Full rigid
75
T+15 minL
50
-10
1.20
Full rigid
75
Penile Doppler waveform - reversed diastolic flow after phentolamine (venous leak resolved)
Representative waveform - Test 2 (with phentolamine): PSV 52.9 cm/s, EDV -9.4 cm/s, HR 75 bpm. Diastolic flow now strongly reversed - the "leak" has disappeared.
Representative waveform

Haemodynamic observations - Test 2: With phentolamine blocking adrenergic override, EDV dropped from 10-14 cm/s to 2-3 cm/s within 5 minutes, and became strongly negative (reversed diastolic flow reaching -9 to -10 cm/s) by T+15 - indicating excellent veno-occlusive function.

Full rigid erection achieved. RI exceeded 0.95 bilaterally. Heart rate settled to 75 bpm.

Conclusion: The apparent veno-occlusive dysfunction seen in Test 1 is not confirmed on repeat testing with adrenergic blockade. The haemodynamic pattern is consistent with sympathetic override (anxiety-mediated) rather than structural venous leak. Arterial inflow is normal. Veno-occlusive mechanism is intact.

Mr G. Ollandini · Consultant Urological Surgeon
GGO Med · ggomed.co.uk · Educational example

The key difference: Same scan, same numbers on the screen - but one is anxiety forcing the gates open (fixable without surgery), and the other is gates with structural holes (requires a different conversation). This is why protocol, context, and clinical judgment matter more than any single number.

Powered by GGO Med